- Original Article
- Open access
- Published:
Characterization of nuvita biosearch center (NBC) isolated lactic acid bacteria strains from human origin and determination of growth kinetic profiles of selected cultures under bioreactor
Annals of Microbiology volume 74, Article number: 26 (2024)
Abstract
Backgorund
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the field of research into the isolation and characterization of probiotics in the prevention of diseases and the need to maintain the continuity of healthy microbiota. Therefore, the aim of this study is to isolate and identify bacteria found in maternal colostrum, breast milk, adult and infant feces, analyze possible probiotic potential, and reveal the developmental kinetics of selected strains.
Results
We isolated 40 bacterial species from 4 different sources and identified 19 bacteria in the form of bacilli through molecular biology and carried out studies with 11 of them. Five of the selected strains showed the better results considering bile salt resistance and ability to survive at different pH and antimicrobial effect. When the adhesion capacity in cell culture is examined, the better 2 strains are; Lactobacillus pontis ZZ6780 and Lactobacillus reuteri NBC2680 were selected and the growth kinetics of these strains were demonstrated at the 3 L bioreactor scale. Finally, the growth kinetics of selected strains were determined and the maximum specific growth rate of selected Lactobacillus pontis ZZ6780 and Lactobacillus reuteri NBC2680 was calculated as 0.412 h− 1 and 0.481 h− 1, respectively. In addition, the dry cell matter amounts were found to be and 4.45 g/L and 5.23 g/L, respectively.
Conclusion
This study established the groundwork for the selection of safety probiotics for the development and application of LAB. It is thought that the two strains obtained as a result of this study can be considered as potential probiotic strains in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.
Introductıon
The human microbiota consists of a population of beneficial and harmful bacteria. Probiotics are live microorganisms that are beneficial for human health (Anadón et al. 2021). Probiotic microorganisms most frequently colonize in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (Nithya et al. 2023). Probiotic bacteria, which maintain the balance in the microbiota, are located in epithelial cells, supporting the development of these cells and regulating the functions of these cells (Toupal and Cosansu 2023).
Lactobacillus spp. is the most common lactic acid bacteria that is gram positive, facultative anaerobic or microaerophilic, rod-shaped and nonsporing (Makaravo et al. 2006). Lactobacilli bacteria have been proven to have many positive effects on health. These effects include protection against intestinal and infections (Karami et al. 2017), regulation of the indigenous microbial population, reduction of lactose intolerance, immunotherapeutic effect (Harahap et al. 2023), increasing the nutritional value of foods, lowering the serum cholesterol level (Nami et al. 2019) and strengthening the immune system. The effectiveness of probiotics is proven through tests such as sensitivity to antibiotics, resistance to bile salts and low pH, thus ensuring consumer safety. Probiotic bacteria are considered safe food (GRAS) due to their bioactive molecules (Srinivash et al. 2023).
Lactic acid bacteria isolated from breast milk have been attractive for their probiotic potential, human origin, and the ability to reside in the intestine (Fernández et al. 2013). Breast milk has been shaped by millions of years of evolution that has resulted in a perfect multifunctional fluid. Actually, beyond the supply of nutrients and vitamins, breast milk provides bioactive factors, including immunoglobulins, cytokines, antimicrobial proteins, hormones, and oligosaccharides, which work in concert to fortify mucosal immunity, shape the gut microbiota, stimulate body growth and it is considered the best source of nutrition for infants (Hennet and Borsig 2016; Verhasselt et al. 2008). Breast milk has long been thought to be aseptic, and the presence of bacteria was assumed to be a result of contamination. Breast milk obtained from healthy women contains approximately 103-104 colony forming units / mililitre (cfu/ml) bacterial flora and is a source of microbiota for infants (Murphy et al. 2017). Breast milk is an important factor in the initiation, development, and composition of the neonatal gut microbiota (Gaudana et al. 2010). Commonly isolated facultative anaerob bacteria from breast milk belong to the genera Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. (Martin et al. 2012; Reis et al. 2016).
Probiotic bacteria must adhere to the mucus layer and epithelial cells covering the intestinal lumen in order to prevent them from sliding out of the small intestine with peristaltic movements (Fernández et al. 2003). Adhesion to the intestinal epithelium is a crucial step for a probiotic bacteria to benefit the host. The ability of probiotic bacteria to adhere to intestinal mucosa is very significant in establishing temporary colonization of probiotics by maintaining the balance of the intestinal microflora. The high adhesion capacity of probiotic bacteria increases their residence time in the intestine. According to literature, Lactobacillus species probiotic strains adhere to the intestinal epithelium and function as a microbial barrier against pathogenic bacteria (Coconnier et al. 1997; Hudault et al. 1997; Servin 2004). Due to the difficulties that may be encountered during in vivo bacterial adhesion studies in human, an in vitro model system for bacterial adhesion to human intestinal cells has been developed (Ouwehand et al. 2002). Caco-2, HT29 are frequently used as epithelial colon cells and HT29-MTX cells are usually used as mucus-secreting cells in vitro studies (Archer et al. 2018; Gagnon et al. 2013).
Recently, understanding of the importance of probiotics has increased interest in large-scale fermentation studies of lactic acid bacteria (Chang and Liew 2013). In this regard, microbial growth kinetics studies are crucial opportunity for advances in biotechnology. Growth kinetic are very useful in the design and control of biotechnological processes because they provide a high degree of information about the growth behavior of microorganisms (Khalfallah et al. 2023). The growth of lactic acid bacteria has a complex structure and many components such as carbon source, nitrogen source, vitamins, inorganic salts and various nutrients are required in the growth medium. Thus, the production of viable cells, biomass and metabolites of lactic acid strains are notably affected by the cultivation conditions and medium components (Brinques et al. 2010). In order to be produced on an industrial scale and used effectively for subsequent processes; It is very important to reveal the specific growth rate (µmax), doubling time (g), number of generations and productivity values (Ucok and Sert 2020).
The aim of present study is to characterize the probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from breast milk, maternal colostrum, adult and infant feces, and to reveal the growth characteristics of selected cultures for industrial production.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
In order to provide isolation from microbial matrices, four different sources were studied: maternal colostrum, breast milk, adult and infant feces. Maternal colostrum was collected 10 days after birth, breast milk and infant feces were collected within 6 months after birth, adult feces from a 28 year old female individual. The study protocol was approved by the Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01/110). All samples was collected as independent each other. Milk samples were collected manually in sterile tubes after disinfecting the teats and the surrounding area, but the first few drops were discarded. In addition, feces samples were collected with sterile swabs. The samples were kept at 4 °C until delivery to the Microbiology Laboratory of the Nuvita Biosearch Center (NBC) (Alyors Inc.) and immediately processed.
Isolation of LAB
For the isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria, 1 gram of sample was taken from the isolation sources and transferred to 9 ml of 0.9% NaCl solutions and homogenized with a stomacher for 2 min. Six-fold dilutions of the samples were made with NaCl solution and 0.1 ml of sample for each dilution was planted on MRS-Cys agar plates. Agar plates were incubated at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions for 48 h (Dunne et al. 2003). An anaerobic jar with an anaerobic gas generating kit (Mitsubishi AneeoroPack, USA) was used to maintain the anaerobic condition. Colonies with different morphologies were purified and tested for catalase reaction, gram staining and microscopic examination. Then, 40 isolates were selected for further studies and stored in 30% glycerol stocks at − 80 °C.
Preliminary characterization of LAB isolates
The isolated bacteria were characterized by gram staining, catalase test, bacillus shape and non-spore-forming morphological and biochemical characteristics. Bacterial colonies that had gram-positive and catalase-negative characteristics and were rod-shaped on microscopic examination were selected for genotypic identification (Adugna and Andualem 2023).
Catalase test
For the catalase test, 3% hydrogen peroxide was used to select catalase-negative isolates. In the catalase test, bacteria taken from solid agar with the help of a loop tip were mixed with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on the slide, and it was observed that gas was released in those with catalase positive (+) and there was no gas in those with catalase negative (-) (Khalil et al. 2018).
Genotypic identification of lactic acid bacteria isolates
Genomic DNA isolation
Stock bacterial isolate kept at -80 °C were activated in deMan, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with cysteine (add 0.05% cysteine-hydrochloride). DNA isolation was performed with the Thermo Scientific GeneJet Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US). Determination of the amount of DNA obtained after isolation was made using a NanoPhotometer (Implen, Germany). The obtained DNA isolate was stored at -20 °C until the next step.
Identification of isolates by RAPD PCR gene sequence
For the discrimination total of 19 LAB strains were grouped by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) with primer M13 (5c-GAGGGTGGCGGTTCT-3c), as reported by Rossetti and Giraffa (2005). For this purpose, sterile water, primer (M13), master mix and DNA template were added to 100 µl PCR tubes, with a total final volume of 50 µl, and all components were mixed thoroughly with a micropipette. DNA fragments were amplified in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) under the following conditions: Initial denaturation occurred at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a 10 min final extension step at 72 °C. The products resulting from the PCR reaction were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and DNA separation was performed at 90 V for 1 h. The gel obtained as a result of electrophoresis was subjected to imaging on a gel imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) (Dertli et al. 2016).
Identification of isolates by 16 S PCR gene gequence
16 S rRNA analysis was applied to 11 bacteria distinguished by RAPD-PCR analysis. The PCR mixture prepared for 16 S rRNA analysis; A PCR mixture targeting 1,500 bp was prepared with 1-µl DNA of the relevant bacterium, 25 µl Q5 High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs), 20 mmol AMP_F (5’GAGAGTTTGATYCTGGCTCAG − 3’) and AMP_R (3’AAGGAGGTGATCCARCCGCA − 5’). This mixture was completed with 50 µl of sterile pure water. Program used for 16 S rRNA PCR analysis: 2 min at 98 °C, 30 s at 98 °C, 20 s at 57 °C. and in the last stage, 5 min at 72 °C. This process was carried out for 25 cycles. The products resulting from the PCR reaction were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel and DNA separation was performed at 90 V for 40 min. The gel obtained as a result of electrophoresis was subjected to imaging in the Bio-Rad Gel Doc EZ Imager. Reaction products were prepared as described above, and PCR products were sequenced and identified by Medsantek (Istanbul, Türkiye). Sequences obtained based on the 99-100% similarity criterion were identified using the BLAST algorithm. Sequences representing the best matches were retrieved and aligned using the clustal method (Kumar et al. 2018; Serrano-Niño et al. 2016; Tamura et al. 2021). The 16 S rRNA sequences of lactic acid bacteria strain NBC2680 and ZZ6780 of human origin identified in this study have been recorded in NCBI GenBank under the number OR999593-PP059538, respectively.
Probiotic potential characterization of bacterial isolates
The criteria that can be base on the selection microorganisms to be used as potential probiotic strains; selection of strain source, biosafety, resistance to low pH and bile salt in in vitro conditions, adhesion to and colonization of intestinal epithelium, antifungal activity, antimicrobial activity, stimulation of immune response, suitability for industrial production processes and survival in shelf life.
Tolerance to low pH
To determine the tolerance to low pH, the potential probiotic bacterial strains were grown in appropriate MRS or MRS-Cys medium with 1% inoculation for 24 h. Each bacterial suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 106 cfu/ml. The bacteria were incubated in MRS or MRS-Cys broth adjusted to pH 2.0 and pH 3.0 with 1 M (Molar) HCl, and control broth for 6 hours. After 0, 3, and 6 hours of incubation, serial dilutions were prepared for bacterial viability and planted on MRS or MRS-Cys agar medium. The analyzes were performed in duplicate.
Resistance of bile salts
To determine the resistance of bile salts, the potential bacteria were grown in appropriate MRS or MRS-Cys medium with 1% inoculation for 24 h. Each bacterial suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 106 cfu/ml. The bacteria were incubated in MRS or MRS-Cys medium supplemented with bile salt (Bovine bile, Sigma-Aldrich) at concentrations of 0.3% and 2% (v/v), and control broth for 6 hours. After 0, 3, and 6 hours of incubation, serial dilutions were prepared for bacterial viability and planted on MRS or MRS-Cys agar medium. The experiment was studied in duplicate.
Haemolytic activity
The bacterial isolates were inoculated on agar containing 5% sheep blood and the petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. At the end of incubation, zone formation in the petri dishes was observed. Staphylococcus aureus strain was used as a positive control. The formation of a green appearance around the colony indicates alpha hemolytic activity, the formation of a clear zone indicates beta hemolytic activity, and the absence of a zone indicates gamma hemolytic activity. This test was performed in duplicate (Maragkoudakis et al. 2009).
Gelatinase activity
The gelatinase activity of Lactobacillus strains was tested according to the method of Daliri et al. (2022) using MRS media containing 3% (w/v) gelatin (NEOGEN, USA). Petri plates containing the medium were spot inoculated with the strains and incubated at 37ºC for 48 h. The plates were flooded with saturated ammonium sulfate solution; The presence of a clear zone around the colonies was considered to be a positive indication of gelatinase production. Duplicates were preperad for each isolate studied. S. aureus strain was used as positive control.
DNase activity
The selected LAB isolates were cultured in duplicate on DNase agar medium (Sigma-Aldrich, EUA) to check production of DNase enzyme and the plates were incubated at 37ºC for 48 h. The plates were flooded with 1 M HCl; The presence of clear pink zone around the colonies was considered to be a positive indication of DNase production (Fonseca et al. 2021).
Antibiotic susceptibility
The susceptibility of potential probiotic strains to Vancomycin (VA, 30 µg) and Ofloxacin (OFX, 5 µg), Clindamycin (C, 2 µg), Erythromycin (E, 15 µg), Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMX, 1.25 µg/23.75 µg), Levofloxacin (LEV, 5 µg), Streptomycin (S, 10 µg), Gentamycin (CN, 10 µg) was determined with antibiotic disks. The bacterial strains were inoculated at 1% into MRS or MRS-Cys broth and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The bacteria were planted on agar petri dishes using the spread plate technique. The antibiotic discs were placed in the middle of the petri dish and were incubated for 24–48 h at 37 °C. The resulting zone diameters were measured and the results were evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) parameters. The analysis was duplicated.
Antimicrobial activitiy
Antimicrobial activity of probiotic isolates was determined using the agar well diffusion method. The probiotic isolates were incubated in appropriate broth for 24 h at 37 °C. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenese pathogenic bacteria were inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). These selected pathogenic bacteria are common microorganisms that harm human health. The density of probiotic and pathogenic bacteria was adjusted according to the McFarland (0.5%) standard. 100 µl of each pathogen to be tested was spread on the BHI agar surface. A corkbor was used to puncture the agar surface. The probiotic bacterial strains in the broth medium were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and the cell-free supernatant (CFS) was collected and its pH was neutralized. 100 µl of CFS was added to the wells on the agar and the petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The clean zone diameters formed around the wells by probiotic bacterial isolates against pathogens were measured in millimeters (mm). The experiment was duplicated (Tsega et al. 2023).
Cell culture
Culturing of caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells
The mucus-secreting cell line HT29-MTX was purchased from European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC) and the human colonic cell line Caco-2 was obtained from The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The Caco-2 cells were routinely grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) with 4.5 g/L glucose (PAN-Biotech, Germany), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) inactivated for one hour at 56 °C (PAN-Biotech, Germany), with 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (PAN-Biotech, Germany), and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (PAN-Biotech, Germany). The culture medium was changed 1 to 2 times per week. The HT29-MTX cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) with 4.5 g/L glucose (PAN-Biotech, Germany), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) inactivated for one hour at 56 °C (PAN-Biotech, Germany), with 1% (v/v) L-Glutamine 2 mM (PAN-Biotech, Germany), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (PAN-Biotech, Germany), and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (PAN-Biotech, Germany). The culture medium was changed 2 to 3 times per week. All experiments were carried out at 37 °C and cells were maintained in a 5% CO2:95% air atmosphere. Fully differentiated cells were obtained 21 days and used in the adhesion assays. At least 24 h before the tests, Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells inthe DMEM medium without serum and antibiotic (DMEM w/o) were seeded in 12-well culture plates at a concentration of 2 × 105 and 3 × 105 cells per well, respectively.
Bacterial adhesion assay
The adhesion ability of selected probiotic microorganisms to Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells was appraised by plate counting method. The bacterial strains were activated in MRS broth under appropriate conditions 24 h before the assays. The Lactobacillus spp. cells were recovered by centrifugation at 8000 g for 5 min, washed twice with sterile 0.85% Sodium chloride (NaCI) solution and suspended at a concentration of 1 × 108 (cfu) /ml in DMEM w/o medium. Initial viable bacteria were counted by plating on MRS agar. The bacterial suspension was added to each well of the cell lines and incubated in a 5% CO2:95% air atmosphere at 37 °C for 3 h. After incubation, the Caco-2 and HT29-MTX monolayers were gently washed five times with PBS (pH 7.4) to remove unattached bacteria. The cells with adherent bacteria were treated with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (PAN-Biotech, Germany) for 3 min at 37 °C followed by addition of culture medium containing FBS to stop the trypsin reaction. The supernatants containing adherent bacterias were collected and determined by plating serial dilutions on MRS agar. The enumeration was done after 48 h incubation at 37 °C in a suitable atmosphere. The results of the adhesion assays were expressed as the ratio of adherent bacteria to the total number of bacteria added to each well. The experiments were performed in duplicate.
Growth kinetics of selected lactobacilli cultures
Strain and inoculum preparation
Following the characterization of lactobacilli for their technological properties and cell culture, NBC2680 and ZZ6780 were further selected for determination of their growth kinetics properties. NBC2680 and ZZ6780 strains were stored in 15% glycerol at -80 °C. Frozen cells were precultured in MRS broth for 37 °C and kept stirring at 200 rpm for 16 h before inoculation in the bioreactor.
Fermentation process and calculation of kinetic parameters
NBC broth medium was used as culture medium for Lactobacillus speices in the glass bioreactor (Minifors 2, Infors HT, Switzerland). The composition of NBC medium is 96.06 g/L glucose, 40.76 g/L yeast extract, 19.43 g/L inorganic salts, and 11.01 ml/L Tween 80 (Kavak et al. 2022). The inorganic salt component is as follows: sodium acetate 45%; dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 20%; di-ammonium hydrogen citrate 20%; magnesium sulfate 10% and manganese sulfate 5%. NBC medium was used as a single medium. Batch cultivations were carried out with 1.5 L total volume at 37 0C and during 18 h, in two parallels. pH was adjusted to pH 5.8 by the automatic addition of 3 N NaOH. Stirrer speed was 150 rpm and after sterilization, oxygen was removed by sparging N2 for 30 min. The inoculum ratio was 1:20 (v/v) of the initial volume.
To determine the kinetic parameters, the specific growth rate µ value is calculated mathematically with the following expression below:
where X (cells per mL) is the microbial population at time t (hours); X0 (cells per mL) is the initial microbial population; µ is the specific growth rate, defined as the tangent in the inflection point (per hour). The value of td (is also referred to as the doubling time) which indicates the generation time is expressed as follows:
\(\:X1\:=\:2X0\)\(\:{\upmu\:}\:=\:ln\:2\:/\:td\:\:\)\(\:\:\:td\:=\:0.693\:/\:{\upmu\:}\:\:\:\:\) Eq. (2)
where n, which is the number of generations, was obtained by dividing the period of logarithmic growing time to the doubling time is expressed as follows:
Productivity (φ) is obtained as the biomass production per unit time per unit culture volume is expressed as follows:
\(\:\phi\:\:biomass\:=\frac{\left(\:Wbm1\:\--\:Wbm0\:\right)}{\left(t1\:\--\:t0\right)}\) Eq. (4)
where W, is the weight of biomass calculated from absorbance values at 600 nm in the Optical Density (OD) graph. OD600 measurements were performed on a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1900, Japan).
Dry cell weight is the weight of biomass calculated from the wet matter value in 1 g of sample in the moisture analyzer (Ohaus MB120, Switzerland).
\(\eqalign{& Dry\;cell\;weight\;\left( {{g \over L}} \right) = \; \cr & Wet\;weight\left( {{g \over L}} \right) \cdot Dryweight(\% ) \cr}\) Eq. (5)
Data analysis
The data were analyzed statistically using the SPSS Statistics software package (version 29.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The quantitative data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan multiple range tests (p < 0.05). The total bacteria cell counts (cfu/ml) was converted to a logarithmic value before statistical analysis.
Results
Preliminary characterization of lab isolates
A total of 40 bacteria were isolated from four different sources of human origin, and 32 bacterial colonies were identified as gram positive and catalase negative from these isolates. It was determined that 19 of the 32 isolates obtained were in the form of bacilli and 13 had cocci morphology.
Genotypic identification of lactic acid bacteria isolates
As a result of RAPD PCR, 7 of 19 bacteria obtained from four different sources of human origin were determined to be similar. Phylogenetic analysis of the 11 strains obtained based on the 16 S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequence was performed and bacterial names were identified from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST system. Molecular identification of bacteria isolated from human sources using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing is shown in Table 1.
According to the genotypic identification and 16 S rRNA sequencing results of bacteria obtained from human origin sources; 1 Lactobacillus rhamnosus, 2 Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, 1 Limosilactobacillus fermentum, 1 Lactobacillus mucosae, 1 Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri, 1 Lactobacillus reuteri, 1 Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, 1 Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, 1 Lactobacillus oris, 1 Lactobacillus pontis strains were identified.
The 16 S rRNA genes of different lactic acid bacteria isolated from human sources were aligned using the MEGA11 program, and the phylogenetic relationship of these strains was determined by creating different subgroups.
Multiple sequence alignment analysis showed that the 16 S rRNA sequences of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from three different sources are close, and similarly, the sequences of Lactobacillus mucosae and Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri strains isolated from two different sources showed closeness. Although Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus mucosae strains were isolated from two different sources, their sequences were related. The similarities of Lactobacillus oris strains isolated from infant feces and Lactobacillus pontis strains isolated from adult feces are shown on the phylogenetic tree based on 16 S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Fig. 1).
Phylogenetic tree based on 16 S rNA gene sequence analysis of lactobacilli isolates. The neighbour-joining method was used to generate the tree. Bootstrap values based on 1000 replications are indicated at the nodes of the tree. The scale bar indicated 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Accession numbers for sequences obtained from the NCBI database
Probiotic potential characterization of bacterial isolates
Tolerance to low pH
Probiotic strains must survive under gastrointestinal stress factors to maintain their biological activity within the host (Mbye et al. 2020). The viability analysis results of 11 selected lactobacilli isolates under pH 2.0 and pH 3.0 acidic conditions are shown in Fig. 2. The viability of bacteria treated under pH 2.0 acidic conditions decreased compared to the control group. At the 6th hour of incubation at pH 2.0, 5 probiotic bacteria strains showed viability. It was determined that NUV81, one of the probiotic bacteria whose viability was examined under pH 3.0 acidic conditions, decreased compared to the control group at the 3rd hour and did not show viability at the 6th hour. Among the probiotic bacteria whose viability was examined in pH 3.0 acidic environment, an increase in the viability of NUV160, NUV185, SA74 and ZZ6780 strains was observed, while a decrease was observed in other strains.
Resistance of bile salts
It has been reported that high bile tolerance benefits probiotic strain colonization in the host gastrointestinal tract (Luo et al. 2012). In this regard, it is important to evaluate the ability of potential probiotics to survive in the presence of bile salt. In the present work, two different bile concentrations were evaluated (0.3-2% w/v). The results determined by the plate count method are given in Table 2. When the results were examined, it was seen that the strains maintained their viability in the medium containing bile salt. In general, an increase in the viability of all strains except NUV81 was observed at both concentrations at the 6th hour of incubation. It was determined that NBC2680, NUV135, SA74 and ZZ6780 strains showed the highest resistance to bile salt at both concentrations.
Hemolytic activity
Hemolytic activity is an important criterion in evaluating potential probiotics in terms of safety. The reason is that hemolytic activity indicates the potential virulence of pathogenic bacteria (Gebre et al. 2023). As a result of the analysis, potential probiotic strains did not form zones and showed gamma hemolytic activity.
Gelatinase and DNase activity
For gelatinase and DNase activity assays, it was observed that no zones were formed around the colonies at the end of the 48 h incubation period when compared to the positive control strain S. auerus. In this studies, none of the strains were found to be positive for gelatinase and DNase activity, validating their relative safety as probiotic candidates.
Antibiotic susceptibility
One of the most important safety considerations for a potential probiotic strains that it does not contain transferable antibiotic resistance genes to the pathogenic microorganisms which may bring about danger. It was observed that all strains were resistant to vancomycin, oflaxin and TMP-SMX, and only the NUV160 strain was determined to have intermediate sensitivity to the TMP-SMX antibiotic. All strains except NUV180 strain were found to be sensitive to clindamycin. While all strains showed sensitivity to erythromycin, strain NBC2680 was observed to have the intermadiate sensitive gene. In general, there is a group of antibiotics to which all strains are sensitive and resistant. The results are show in Table 3.
Antimicrobial activity
Cell-free supernatant (CFS) is a liquid containing metabolites such as organic acids, fatty acids, bacteriocin released into the medium used during microbial growth. LAB demonstrate antimicrobial activity with these metabolites they produce (Mani-López et al. 2022; Tenea et al. 2018). The ability to inhibit pathogenic microorganisms growth is one of the mechanisms by which probiotic bacteria perform to protect the host. The analysis results of the antimicrobial effects of potential probiotic isolates against the pathogens E. coli, S. aureus, S. enterica and L. monocytogenes are given in Table 4.
The NUV7 strain showed inhibitory effects on all four different pathogens studied. In general, probiotic strains showed the most inhibition against the S. enterica pathogen. It was determined that the pathogen with the lowest inhibition zone diameter was E. coli. NUV135 strain formed the highest zone diameters against the S. aureus pathogen, NUV160 and NUV180 strains against the S. enterica pathogen, and NUV7 and NUV17 strains against the L. monocytogenes pathogen.
Cell culture
The adhesion ability to Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells was evaluated for the 11 selected LAB and the results are presented in Table 5. The seven isolates showed a very low percentage of adhesion ability. However ZZ6780, NBC2680 and NUV81 showed higher percentages (12.04%, 10.67% and 10.63% of adhesion, respectively) of adhesion to Caco-2 cells compared to the positive control L. rhamnosus GG (10.04%). Similar results were obtained for the adhesion to HT29-MTX cells. While the percentage of adhesion to HT29-MTX cells of the control strain L. rhamnosus GG was 9.24%, the adhesion percentages of ZZ6780, NBC2680 and NUV81 strains were determined 10.03%, 9.70% and 9.61%, SA74 and NUV180 were characterized by its moderate adhesion capacity to Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells compared to LGG control strain (8.51% and 8.74%, 7.22% and 5.48% of adhesion, respectively). It was observed that the adhesion percentage of five strains showing low capacity adhesion to HT29-MTX cells was higher than the adhesion percentage to Caco-2 cells.
Growth kinetics of selected culture
NBC2680 and ZZ6780 were further selected for determination of their growth kinetics properties. Both strains were tested for their growth kinetics under laboratory-scale on 3 L bioreactor fermentation conditions and µmax (specific growth ratemax), td (doubling time), n (number of generations), φ and φmax (productivity) were determined. The growth kinetic parameters and biomass value are show in Table 6.
The growth versus time, OD600, and dry weight amount per 1 g/L curves of NBC2680 and ZZ6780 are given in Fig. 3. Mainly, L. reuteri and L. pontis growth was characterized by a delay phase of about 3–4 h, a steep exponential phase for 12 h, followed by a fixed phase for 2 h. The maximum increase in the count of bacteria was found as 3.1 log10 cfu/ml when NBC2680 had reached the stationary phase. Also, the maximum increase in the count of bacteria was found as 2.25 log10 cfu/ml when the ZZ6780 had reached the stationary phase.
Discussion
The identification of lactic acid bacteria with probiotic properties based on physiological and biochemical properties, their identification on the basis of species and genus using international specific primers has been widely published in the literature. Since the 16 S rRNA gene is highly conserved among different bacteria and archaea, phylogenetic studies have been handled in this context. Genomic DNA was isolated by the method described by Dertli et al. (2016). The amplified PCR product was purified and sequenced to identify the isolated bacteria.
Isolation and identification of strains human origin revealed the presence of L. mucosae, L. reuteri, L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. oris, L. rhamnosus, L. parabuchneri, L. pontis, L. fermentum strain. When the studies in isolation from breast milk were examined, it was determined that the L. rhamnosus strain was generally included in each study (Damaceno et al. 2023; Kang et al. 2020; Li et al. 2017).
L. reuteri, L. paracasei and L. plantarum bacteria obtained by isolation of infant feces Zhang et al. 2018; Ahrné et al. 2005; while it was similar to the study results in the articles by Khalil et al. 2007; it was determined that there was no article stating that L. oris and L. mucosae bacteria were found in infant feces. As a result of the isolation studies, it was concluded that L. paracasei bacteria was commonly found in infant feces. The presence of L. fermentum and L. rhamnosus bacteria in the maternal colostrum in our study was similar to the study of Liu et al. (2020), and both studies determined the presence of the L. rhamnosus strain.
L. parabuchneri bacteria isolated from adult feces was similar to our study because it was also found in the results of previous studies (Dal Bello et al. 2003). When the isolation results were examined, it was concluded that L. parabuchneri bacteria was not found very frequently in adult feces. The results of the L. rhamnosus strain isolated from adult feces was supported by the studies of Kang et al. (2017). While L. pontis bacteria was not isolated from adult feces, it was determined to be present in the isolation study from vaginal flora (Shazadi et al. 2022; Mehta et al. 2020).
It was determined that the lactic acid bacterium common in isolations from adult feces, breast milk and maternal colostrum was L. rhamnosus. While L. rhamnosus obtained from breast milk and maternal colostrum was found on the same branching with its similarities, L. rhamnosus isolated from adult feces was located on different branching. The similarity of L. oris and L. paracasei bacteria isolated from infant feces was revealed as a result of phylogenetic branching. It was determined that L. mucosae and L. parabuchneri bacteria isolated from different sources were located in the same branch.
The characterization as probiotics is determined by their ability to survive in the low pH of the stomach and the high concentration of bile salt in the gastrointestinal tract (Kobierecka et al. 2017). The pH in human stomach ranges from 1 during fasting, to 4.5 after a meal (Wang et al. 2009). Since Lactobacillus strains are known to survive at pH 4.6, which is the common final acidity of many fermented dairy products, lower pH values (2.0 and 3.0) were examined. The pH value of 3.0 has been most investigated to use probiotic strains (Shokryazdan et al. 2014), because strain viability is reduced at pH 2.0 (Bhatt et al. 2012). In our study, the highest viability at the end of the 6th hour at pH 2 was observed in NBC2680, while at pH 3 it was also observed in ZZ6780. In the studies of De Angelis et al. in 2006, it was reported that the L. mucosae strain isolated from pig feces showed resistance at pH 2.0 and pH 3.0 in 180 min; similar results were seen in our study. (De Angelis et al. 2006). Bile released in the small intestine damages bacteria by destroying the bacterial cell membrane. Probiotics has a bile salt hydrolase enzyme (BSH), which hydrolyzes bile salts and reduces their solubility (Jannah et al. 2014; Hwanhlem et al. 2010). Gondaliya and Ramani analyzed the bile salt resistance of L. fermentum and L. oris strains isolated from breast milk at 0.5% and 1.50% concentration, and as a result of the analysis, it was observed that bacterial viability decreased with increasing concentration (Gondaliya and Ramani 2021). It was reported by Jose et al. that the tolerance of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from dairy food product and animal rumen to 0.3% bile salt was higher than the tolerance to 2.0% bile salt (Jose et al. 2015). Overall, Lactobacillus strains are tolerant to bile salts (Liu et al. 2020; Mohammedi et al. 2018; Khalkhali and Mojgani 2017).
The present study assessed safety of the isolated strains. Gelatinase and DNase are the enzymes mostly produced by pathogenic microorganisms (Zhao et al. 2011). It was determined that the strains did not have any potential virulence properties such as hemolytic, gelatinase and DNase activities. Previous studies of hemolytic activity have reported that lactobacilli group were non-hemolytic (Halder et al. 2017; Kaktcham et al. 2012). It was observed that Lactobacillaceae family isolated from milk by Maragkoudakis and colleagues showed γ hemolytic activity (Maragkoudakis et al. 2006). It has been reported in previous studies that most Lactobacillus strains do not show gelatinase and DNase activity (Abouloifa et al. 2020; Fonseca et al. 2021; Huligere et al. 2023).
Antibiotic susceptibility studies showed that was determined 7 strains of the selected probiotic bacteria were resistant to Levoflaxin and 4 strains had intermediate sensitivity. It was determined that 8 strains were resistant to the antibiotic streptomycin, 2 strains had intermediate sensitivity and 1 strain was sensitive. It was observed that strain NBC2680 had intermediate sensitivity to the antibiotic gentamicin, while all other strains had resistance genes. Previous stuides, different resistance rates to ciprofloxacin (60–70%), gentamicin (0–100%), and streptomycin (70–80%) have been reported among Lactobacillus spp., including L. helveticus, L. casei, and L. plantarum (Hummel et al. 2007; Guo et al. 2017; Li et al. 2019). This indicates the existence of considerable differences in antibiotic resistance both on an intergenus and interspecies level as well as a species dependency in Lactobacillus spp. similar to our study results, Florez et al. reported that the L. plantarum strain showed high sensitivity to the antibiotic Clindamycin (Florez et al. 2006). Chang et al. observed that the L. reuteri strain was sensitive to erythromycin but resistant to gentamicin (Chang et al. 2023).
CFS, which contains metabolites such as hydrogen peroxide, short-chain fatty acids and low molecular weight proteins produced by lactic acid bacteria, shows anti-microbial properties by inhibiting the growth of pathogens (Tanaka et al. 1999; Torshizi et al. 2008). It was observed by Wang et al. that the L. plantarum strain showed high antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, E. coli and S. enterica pathogens (Wang et al. 2011). These results are similar to the results in our study. According to the antimicrobial results of Ambalam et al., L. rhamnosus strain showed high activity against L. monocyctogenes and our analysis results were supported (Ambalam et al. 2009). In the study conducted by Jomehzade et al., with lactic acid bacteria isolated from infant feces in southwest Iran, it was determined that L. plantarum, L. fermentum, L. rhamnosus and L. paracasei strains were effective against E. coli and S. enterica pathogens (Jomehzade et al. 2020). The activity of the lactic acid bacteria tested in this study against pathogens has been supported by previous studies (Jovanovic et al. 2015; Mollova et al. 2024).
Probiotic bacterial strains must be able to survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract and colonize the small intestine and colon for a long period to provide host health benefits (Suskovic et al., 2001). We analyzed the ability of 11 selected probiotic strains to adhere to the intestinal epithelial cells Caco-2 and the mucus-secreting cells HT29-MTX. In general, it was observed differences in the adhesion capacities of probiotic isolates depending on the type of probiotic bacteria strain and the isolated source. It was determined that NBC2680 strain, which showed the highest tolerance to 0.3% bile salt, and ZZ6780 strain, which showed high resistance in pH 3 environment, showed high adhesion ability to both cell lines. Moreover, It has been observed that bacteria isolated from adult and infant feces show higher adhesion ability compared to the other sources. It has also been associated in previous studies that probiotic bacteria that are resistant to low acid environment and bile salt have a higher capacity to adhere to the intestinal epithelium and mucosa (Bao et al. 2010; Guo et al. 2015; Jin et al. 1998; Ross et al. 2005). L. plantarum probiotic bacteria strains, which is known to have high adhesion ability (Duary et al. 2011), showed average adhesion capacity compared to the L. rhamnosus GG control strain in our adhesion tests. When the findings of the L. rhamnosus species obtained from three different sources were evaluated, the probiotic isolated from adult feces showed higher adhesion capacity than the other sources. L. rhamnosus strains have a high capacity to adhere to the intestinal mucosa (Chae et al. 2022). In our results, it was observed that L. rhamnosus strains had increased adhesion efficiency in mucus-secreting cells compared to intestinal epithelial cells. Similar to our findings, it was found previously that the L. paracasei strain isolated from feces showed lower adhesion capacity than the L. rhamnosus strain (Verdenelli et al. 2009). According to the result of our adhesion assays, it was found that L. pontis, L. reuteri and L. mucosae species showed high adhesion ability compared to the selected other species. The result is similar to that observed previously (Jensen et al. 2014; Pearce et al. 2018; Repally et al. 2018; Roos and Jonsson 2002). However, there was no study about the adhesion to epithelial cells and intestinal mucosa of L. pontis and L. oris strains.
Determination of the growth parameters in a reasonable accepted medium is a crucial step for the commercial application of a probiotic strain. Considering the previous studies, many factors such as pH, air supply rate, fermentation temperature, fermentation operation system (batch, fed-batch or continuous) affected lactic acid bacteria growth although the same synthetic medium (MRS broth) was used as the fermentation medium (Kayacan et al. 2023; Mechmeche et al. 2017; Zheng et al. 2018). Additionally, determining growth kinetics is an important issue for biotechnological processes. In the present study, µmax value was calculated to be 0.481 h− 1 for L. reuteri NBC280 with a doubling time (td) of 1.21 h− 1. Additionally, number of generations (n) was calculated to be 6.4 for strain NBC2680 productivity (φ) and maximum specific productivity (φ max) values were 0.572 g L− 1 and 1.02 g L− 1, respectively. In terms of growth kinetics of ZZ6780 µmax value was calculated 0.412 h− 1 whereas the doubling time (td) 1.12 h− 1. The number of generations (n) was calculated to be, 5.5 and productivity (φ) and maximum specific productivity (φ max) value for ZZ6780 were 0.498 g L− 1 and 0.764 g L− 1, respectively. These findings revealed that maximum specific growth rate of both strains was higher in comparison to the growth kinetics of other LAB strains (Gao et al. 2009; Rezvani et al. 2017; Ucok and Sert 2020). According to the fermantation results, the wet weight of dry biomass NBC2680 and ZZ6780 was determined as 29.80% and 27.91%, repectively. Based on this, biomass production was 5.23 g/L and 4.45 g/L on dry cell matter basis, repectively. In previous studies; Hwang et al. (2011) reported that during the batch fermentation of LP02 isolated from infant feces, 2.2 g/L dry cell was produced. Śliżewska and Chlebicz-Wójcik (2020), developed L.reuteri LOCK 1092 strain on MRS and SSM medium and found the specific growth rate 0.14 and 0.31 h− 1, respectively. Burge et al. the was determined maximal specific growth of the three L. reuteri strains cultivated in MRS medium supplemented with 20 g/L of glucose. Maximum specific growth (µmax − 1) rates were equal to 0.82, 0.80, and 0.50 h− 1 respectively for the DSM 20,016, DSM 17,938 and ATCC 53,608 strains (Burge et al. 2015). Choi et al. (2021), find out that the maximum biomass was 4.3 g/L amount of L. plantarum 200,655. Fonteles et al. (2011), DSM 20,016 strain of determined the cell viability was 8.3 log cfu m/L and biomass concentration 3.96 g/L at the end of the fermentation. In different study, Lactobacillus casei biomass was produced at a maximum dry cell of 0.45 g/L in batch, semi-batch and continuous cultures (Aguirre-Ezkauriatza et al. 2010). Furthermore, L. plantarum strain Pi06 cultured in MRS-Cys (0.05% L cysteine) medium was reported produced 4.60 g/L biomass (Hwang et al. 2012). Determination of the growth kinetics of NBC2680 and ZZ6780 in the study revealed their suitability for industrial scale growth applications. Because the growth kinetic data both dry cell matter, maximum specific growth rate and cell viability amount obtained as a result of the study are promising when compared to previous studies.
Conclusion
To summarize ın the present study, 40 bacteria were isolated from 4 different sources of human origin: breast milk, maternal colostrum, adult feces and infant feces. 19 of these isolates were determined to be lactobacilli as a result of analyzes and microscopic analyzing, and 7 of them were determined to be similar as a result of RAPD PCR. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16 S rRNA gene sequence of 11 strains obtained as a result of eliminating similar bacterial strains was performed. According to the findings obtained after isolation and identification, human feces; regardless of adult or infant, is reach in terms of containing various lactobacilli than human milk. Lactobacillus pontis, Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus from adult feces; Lactobacillus oris, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus mucosae from infant feces; Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus fermentum bacteria were isolated from maternal colostrum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus bacteria were isolated from breast milk. These results show the importance of the isolation source in obtaining different types and numbers of potential probiotic bacterial strains.
After the identification step, characterization studies were carried out to determine the potential probiotic properties of 11 strains. As a result of the investigation of the potential probiotic properties of 11 different Lactobacillus strains obtained from 4 different sources, the most prominent strains were SA74, NUV180, NUV81, NBC2680 and ZZ6780. NBC2680 and ZZ6780 strains were selected through cell culture studies and their fermentation was studied. Finally, determination of the growth kinetics of NBC2680 and ZZ6780 demonstrated their suitability for industrial-scale growth applications. As a result of the study, NBC2680 and ZZ6780 strains, which are considered to be commercialized, were registered in NCBI Genbank. It is thought that the results of this study will play an important role in introducing potential probiotic strains to the industry.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Abouloifa H, Rokni Y, Bellaouchi R, Ghabbour N, Karboune S, Brasca M, Salah RB, Chihib NE, Saalaoui E, Asehraou A (2020) Characterization of probiotic properties of antifungal Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional fermenting green olives. Probiotics Antimicrob 12:683–696. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-019-09543-8
Adugna M, Andualem B (2023) Isolation, characterization and safety assessment of probiotic lactic acid bacteria from metata ayib (traditional spiced cottage cheese). Food Hum 1:85–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foohum.2023.05.002
Aguirre-Ezkauriatza EJ, Aguilar-Yáñez JM, Ramírez-Medrano A, Alvarez MM (2010) Production of probiotic biomass (Lactobacillus casei) in goat milk whey: comparison of batch, continuous and fed-batch cultures. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(8):2837-44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.047
Ahrné S, Lönnermark E, Wold AE, Aberg N, Hesselmar B, Saalman R, Strannegård IL, Molin G, Adlerberth I (2005) Lactobacilli in the intestinal microbiota of Swedish infants. Microbes Infect 2005 Aug-Sep 7(11–12):1256–1262. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.04.011
Anadón A, Ares I, Martínez-Larrañaga MR, Martínez MA (2021) Probiotics: safety and toxicity considerations. Nutrac 2021:1081–1105. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-821038-3.00065-3
Archer AC, Kurrey NK, Halami PM (2018) In vitro adhesion and anti-inflammatory properties of native Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii spp. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(1):243–256. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jam.13757
Bao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang S, Dong X et al (2010) Screening of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from traditional dairy products. Food Control 21:695–701. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.10.010
Bhatt VD, Vaidya YH, Kunjadia PD, Kunjadia AP (2012) Isolation and characterization of probiotic bacteria from human milk. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care 3:62–70
Brinques GB, do Carmo Peralba M, Ayub MA (2010) Optimization of probiotic and lactic acid production by Lactobacillus plantarum in submerged bioreactor systems. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;37(2):205 – 12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10295-009-0665-1
Burgé G, Saulou-Bérion C, Moussa M, Allais F, Athes V, Spinnler HE (2015) Relationships between the use of Embden Meyerhof pathway (EMP) or Phosphoketolase pathway (PKP) and lactate production capabilities of diverse Lactobacillus reuteri strains. J Microbiol. 2015;53(10):702 – 10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12275-015-5056-x
Çakmakoğlu SK, Vurmaz M, Bezirci E, Kaya Y, Dikmen H, Göktaş H, Demirbaş F, Encu B, Acar Soykut E, Alemdar F, Çakır İ, Durak MZ, Arıcı M, Sağdıç O, Türker M, Dertli E (2023) Isolation and characterization of yogurt starter cultures from traditional yogurts and growth kinetics of selected cultures under lab-scale fermentation. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2023;53(4):454–463. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/10826068.2022.2098325
Chae SA, Ramakrishnan SR, Kim T, Kim SR, Bang WY, Jeong CR, Yang J, Kim SJ (2022) Anti-inflammatory and anti-pathogenic potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 isolated from feces of breast-fed infants. Microb Pathog. 2022;173(Pt A):105857. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105857
Chang CP, Liew SL (2013) Growth Medium Optimization for Biomass Production of a Probiotic Bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469. J. Food Biochem. 2013, 37, 536–543
Chang Z, Xiao Q, Ye Y, Iqbal M, Duan M, Chamba Y, Shang P (2023) Isolation, Identification and Biological Characteristics of Lactobacillus reuteri from Tibetan Pigs. Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1–6, 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17582/journal.pjz/20220702030717
Choi GH, Lee NK, Paik HD (2021) Optimization of medium composi tion for biomass production of Lactobacillus plantarum 200655 using response surface methodology. J Microbiol Biotechnol 31(5):717–725. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4014/jmb.2103.03018
CLSI (2020) Performance standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 30 th informational supplement (Junnary 2020 Update). CLSI document M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
Coconnier MH, Liévin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Hudault S, Servin AL (1997) Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(5):1046-52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/AAC.41.5.1046
Dal Bello F, Walter J, Hammes WP, Hertel C (2003) Increased complexity of the species composition of lactic acid bacteria in human feces revealed by alternative incubation condition. Microb Eco, 455–463
Daliri EBM, Kim Y, Do Y, Chelliah R, Oh DH (2022) In vitro and in vivo cholesterol reducing ability and safety of probiotic candidates isolated from Korean fermented soya beans. Probiotics Antimicrob 14(1):87–98. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-021-09798-0
Damaceno QS, Gallotti B, Reis IMM, Totte YCP, Assis GB, Figueiredo HC, Silva TF, Azevedo V, Nicoli JR, Martins FS (2023) Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from Human Milk. Probiotics Antimicrob. 2023;15(3):491–501. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-021-09866-5
De Angelis M, Siragusa S, Berloco M, Caputo L, Settanni L, Alfonsi G, Amerio M, Grandi A, Ragni A, Gobbetti M (2006) Selection of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces to be used as additives in pelleted feeding. Res Microbiol. 2006. Oct;157(8):792–801. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.resmic.2006.05.003
Dertli E, Mercan E, Arıcı M, Yılmaz MT, Sağdıç O (2016) Characterisation of lactic acid bacteria from Turkish sourdough and determination of their exopolysaccharide (EPS) production characteristics. LWT-Food Sci Technol 71:116–124. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.030
Duary RK, Rajput YS, Batish VK, Grover S (2011) Assessing the adhesion of putative indigenous probiotic lactobacilli to human colonic epithelial cells. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(5):664 – 71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4103/0971-5916.90992
Dunne C, O’Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G, Morrisey D, O’Halloran S, Feeney M, Flynn S, Fitzgerald G, Daly C, Kiely B, O’Sullivan GC, Shanahan F, Collins JK (2003) In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr, 73 (2). 386S-392S. February 2003.
Fernández MF, Boris S, Barbes C (2003) Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 94:449–455
Fernández L, Langa S, Martín V, Maldonado A, Jiménez E, Martín R, Rodríguez JM (2013) The human milk microbiota: origin and potential roles in health and disease. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69(1):1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.phrs.2012.09.001
Florez AB, Egervärn M, Danielsen M, Tosi L, Morelli L, Lindgren S, Mayo B (2006) Susceptibility of Lactobacillus plantarum strains to six antibiotics and definition of new susceptibility-resistance cutoff values. Microb Drug Resist. 2006 Winter;12(4):252–256. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/mdr.2006
Fonseca HC, de Sousa Melo D, Ramos CL, Dias DR, Schwan RF (2021) Probiotic properties of lactobacilli and their ability to inhibit the adhesion of enteropathogenic bacteria to Caco-2 and HT-29 cells. Probiotics Antimicro 13:102–112. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-020-09659-2
Gagnon M, Zihler Berner A, Chervet N, Chassard C, Lacroix C (2013) Comparison of the Caco-2, HT-29 and the mucus-secreting HT29-MTX intestinal cell models to investigate Salmonella adhesion and invasion. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;94(3):274-9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.06.027
Gao X, Qiao SY, Lu WQ (2009) Determination of an economical medium for growth of Lactobacillus fermentum using response surface methodology. Lett Appl Microbiol 49:556–561. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02705.x
Gaudana SB, Dhanani AS, Bagchi T (2010) Probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus strains isolated from food and of human origin. Br J Nutr 103(11):1620–1628
Gebre TS, Emire SA, Chelliah R, Aloo SO, Oh DH (2023) Isolation, functional activity, and safety of probiotics from Ethiopian traditional cereal-based fermented beverage,Borde. LWT 184:115076. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115076
Gondaliya SM, Ramani VM (2021) Determination of Probiotic Properties of L. fermentum MT308789 and L. oris MT308790 Isolated from Mother Breast Milk. (2021). Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res, 11(1), L63-72
Guo CF, Zhang S, Yuan YH, Yue TL, Li JY (2015) Comparison of lactobacilli isolated from Chinese suantsai and koumiss for their probiotic and functional properties. J Funct Foods 2015; 12: 294 302. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jff.2014.11.029
Guo H, Pan L, Li L, Lu J, Kwok L, Menghe B, Zhang H, Zhang W (2017) Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes from Lactobacillus isolated from traditional dairy products. J Food Sci 2017; 82:724–730 https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/1750-3841.13645
Halder D, Mandal M, Chatterjee SS, Pal NK, Mandal S (2017) Indigenous probiotic Lactobacillus isolates presenting antibiotic like activity against human pathogenic Bacteria. Biomedicines 5(2):31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biomedicines5020031
Harahap P, Munir NIP, Hutahaean E, S (2023) Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics isolated from traditional fermented foods and beverages of Sumatra (Indonesia) and synbiotics in mice. Biodivers J Biol Diver, 24(2)
Hennet T, Borsig L (2016) Breastfed at Tiffany’s. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(6):508–518. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.02.008
Hudault S, Liévin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Servin AL (1997) Antagonistic activity exerted in vitro and in vivo by Lactobacillus casei (strain GG) against Salmonella typhimurium C5 infection. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(2):513-8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/aem.63.2.513-518.1997
Huligere SS, Chandana Kumari VB, Alqadi T, Kumar S, Cull CA, Amachawadi RG, Ramu R (2023) Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria with potential probiotic activity and further investigation of their activity by α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitions of fermented batters. Front Microbiol 13:1042263. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1042263
Hummel AS, Hertel C, Holzapfel WH, Franz CM (2007) Antibiotic resistances of starter and probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:730–739
Hwang CF, Chen JN, Huang YT, Mao ZY (2011) Biomass production of Lactobacillus plantarum LP02 isolated from infant feces with potential cholesterol-lowering ability. Afr J Biotechnol 10:7010–7020
Hwang CF, Chang JH, Houng JY, Tsai CC, Lin CK, Tsen HY (2012) Optimization of medium composition for improving biomass production of Lactobacillus plantarum Pi06 using the Taguchi array design and the Box-Behnken method. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 17(4):827–834. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12257-012-0007-4
Hwanhlem N, Watthanasakphuban N, Riebroy S, Benjakul S, H-Kittikun A, Maneerat S (2010) Probiotic lactic acid bacteria from Kung‐Som: isolation, screening, inhibition of pathogenic bacteria. Int J Food Sci Technol 45(3):594–601
Jannah SN, Dinoto A, Wiryawan KG, Rusmana I (2014) Characteristic of lactic acid bacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract cemani chicken and their potential use as probiotics. Med Pet 37:182–189. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5398/medpet.2014.37.3.182
Jensen H, Roos S, Jonsson H, Rud I, Grimmer S, Van Pijkeren P J, Britton A R, Axelsson L (2014) Role of Lactobacillus reuteri cell and mucus-binding protein A (CmbA) in adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells and mucus in vitro. Microbiol 2014:160–671
Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S (1998) Acid and bile tolerance of Lactobacillus isolated from chicken intestine. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998; 27: 183–185. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00405.x
Jomehzadeh N, Javaherizadeh H, Amin M, Saki M, Al-Ouqaili MTS, Hamidi H, Seyedmahmoudi M, Gorjian Z (2020) Isolation and identification of potential probiotic Lactobacillus species from feces of infants in southwest Iran. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:524–530. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.034
Jose NM, Bunt CR, Hussain MA (2015) Comparison of microbiological and probiotic characteristics of lactobacilli isolates from dairy food products and animal rumen contents. Microorganisms 3(2):198–212
Jovanović JN, Nikolić B, Šeatović S, Zavišić G, Mitić-Ćulafić D, Vuković-Gačić B, Knežević-Vukčević J (2015) Characterization of some potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strains of human origin. Food sci Biotechnol 24:1781–1788
Kaktcham PM, Zambou NF, Tchouanguep FM, El-Soda M, Choudhary MI (2012) Antimicrobial and Safety Properties of Lactobacilli Isolated from two Cameroonian Traditional Fermented Foods. Sci Pharm 2012 Jan-Mar 80(1):189–203. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3797/scipharm.1107-12
Kang CH, Kim YG, Han SH, Jeong Y, Paek NS (2017) Antibacterial activity and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria from Korean intestine origin. KSBB J 32(2):153–159. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7841/ksbbj.2017.32.2.153
Kang W, Pan L, Peng C, Dong L, Cao S, Cheng H, Zhou H (2020) Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from human milk. J Dairy Sci 103(11):9980–9991. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3168/jds.2020-18704
Karami S, Roayaei M, Hamzavi H, Bahmani M, Hassanzad-Azar H, Leila M, Rafieian-Kopaei M (2017) Isolation and identification of probiotic Lactobacillus from local dairy and evaluating their antagonistic effect on pathogens. Int J Pharm Investig 7(3):137
Kavak AE, Selen V, Tamtürk F (2022) Optimization of Media Composition for Maximum Growth of Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum NBC-08 using response surface methodology. YYU J Agric Sci 32(1):69–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.29133/yyutbd.993781
Khalfallah R, Mechmeche M, Jmoui I, Ksontini H, Hamdi M, Kachouri F (2023) Growth Kinetics of Lactobacillus plantarum in Sesame Seed Protein Extract Media. Chem Afr (2023) 6:1217–1226. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s42250-022-00573-4
Khalil R, El-Halafawy K, Mahrous H, Kamaly K, Frank J, Soda E, M (2007) Evaluation of the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from faeces of breast-fed infants in Egypt. Afr J Biotechnol, 6(7)
Khalil ES, Manap MY, Mustafa S, Amid M, Alhelli AM, Aljoubori A (2018) Probiotic Characteristics of Exopolysaccharides-producing Lactobacillus Isolated from Some Traditional Malaysian Fermented Foods. CyTA J. Food 2018, 16, 287–298. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/19476337.2017.1401007
Khalkhali S, Mojgani N (2017) Characterization of Candidate probionts isolated from human breast milk. Cell Mol Biol. 2017;63(5):82–88. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.14715/cmb/2017.63.5.15
Kobierecka PA, Wyszyńska AK, Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk T, Kuczkowski M, Tuzimek A, Piotrowska W, Górecki A, Adamska I, Wieliczko A, Bardowski J, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK (2017) In vitro characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. strains isolated from the chicken digestive tract and their role in the inhibition of Campylobacter colonization. Microbiol open, 2017;6(5):e00512. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/mbo3.512
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol biol evol 35(6):1547
Li SW, Watanabe K, Hsu CC, Chao SH, Yang ZH, Lin YJ, Chen CC, Cao YM, Huang HC, Chang CH, Tsai YC (2017) Bacterial Composition and Diversity in Breast Milk Samples from Mothers Living in Taiwan and Mainland China. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:965. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00965
Li Y, Li L, Kromann S, Chen M, Shi L, Meng H (2019) Antibiotic Resistance of Lactobacillus spp and Streptococcus thermophilus Isolated from Chinese Fermented Milk Products Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 221–228. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/fpd. 2018.2516
Liu W, Chen M, Duo L, Wang J, Guo S, Sun H, Menghe B, Zhang H (2020) Characterization of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria isolated from human colostrum. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(5):4013–4025. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3168/jds.2019-17602
Luo Y, Ma BC, Zou LK, Cheng JG, Cai YH, Kang JP, Li B, Gao XH, Wang P, Xiao JJ (2012) Identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from forest musk deer feces, Afr J Microbiol Res, 6 (29), 5871–5881, August 2012
Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D (2006) Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 2006;103(42):15611-6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.0607117103
Mani-López, Emma D, Arrioja‐Bretón, Aurelio López‐Malo (2022) The impacts of antimicrobial and antifungal activity of cell‐free supernatants from lactic acid bacteria in vitro and foods. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 21(1):604–641. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/1541-4337.12872
Maragkoudakis PA, Zoumpopoulou G, Miaris C, Kalantzopoulos G, Pot B, Tsakalidou E (2006) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int Dairy J 16(3):189–199. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.02.009
Maragkoudakis PA, Mountzouris KC, Psyrras D, Cremonese S, Fischer J, Cantor MD, Tsakalidou E (2009) Functional properties of novel protective lactic acid bacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int J food microbiol, 130(3), 219–226 https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.027
Martın V, Maldonado-Barragan A, Moles L, RodriguezBanos M, del Campo R, Fernandez L, Rodrıguez JM, Jimenez E (2012) Sharing of bacterial strains between breast milk and infant feces. J Hum Lact 28:36–44
Mbye M, Baig MA, AbuQamar SF, El-Tarabily KA, Obaid RS, Osaili TM, Al-Nabulsi AA, Turner MS, Shah NP, Ayyash MM (2020) Updates on understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria responses to environmental stresses and highlights on proteomic analyses. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(3):1110–1124. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/1541-4337.12554
Mechmeche M, Kachouri F, Yaghlane HB, Ksontini H, Setti K, Hamdi M (2017) Kinetic analysis and mathematical modeling of growth parameters of Lactobacillus plantarum in protein-rich isolates from tomato seed. Food Sci Technol Int 23(2):128–141. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/1082013216665706
Mehta O, Ghosh TS, Kothidar A, Gowtham MR, Mitra R, Kshetrapal P, Wadhwa N, Thiruvengadam R, GARBH-Ini study group, Nair GB, Bhatnagar S, Das B (2020) Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species. Microb Ecol. 2020;80(2):487–499. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00248-020-01501-0
Mohammadi F, Eshaghi M, Razavi S, Sarokhalil DD, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR (2018) Characterization of bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus spp. isolated from mother’s milk. Microb Pathog 118:242–246
Mollova D, Batsalova T, Dzhambazov B, Vasileva T, Bivolarski V, Iliev I (2024) In vitro Digestion: Exploring the probiotic abilities and metabolization of human milk oligosaccharides by two strains of Limosilactobacillus fermentum isolated from breast milk. J. Funct. Foods 114, 106068. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jff.2024.106068
Nami Y, Bakhshayesh RV, Manafi M, Hejazi MA (2019) Hypocholesterolaemic activity of a novel autochthonous potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum YS5 isolated from yogurt. LWT 111:876–882. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.057
Nithya A, Misra S, Panigrahi C, Dalbhagat CG, Mishra HN (2023) Probiotic potential of fermented foods and their role in non-communicable diseases management: An understanding through recent clinical evidences. Food Chem Adv. Volume 3 December 2023, 100381 https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.focha.2023.100381
Ouwehand AC, Seppo S, Tölkö S, Robert P, Ovaska J, Salminen E (2002) Restected human colonic tissue: new model for characterizing adhesion of lactic acid bacteria. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:184–186
Pearce SC, Coia HG, Karl JP, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Zachos NC, Racicot K (2018) Intestinal in vitro and ex vivo Models to Study Host-Microbiome Interactions and Acute Stressors. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1584. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fphys.2018.01584
Reis NA, Saraiva MA, Duarte EA, de Carvalho EA, Vieira BB, Evangelista-Barreto NS (2016) Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from human milk. J Appl Microbiol Sep 121(3):811–820. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jam.13173
Repally A, Perumal V, Dasari A, Palanichamy E, Venkatesan A (2018) Isolation, Identification of Lactobacillus mucosae AN1 and its Antilisterial Peptide Purification and Characterization. Probiotics Antimicrob. 2018;10(4):775–786. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-017-9341-3
Rezvani F, Ardestani F, Najafpour G (2017) Growth Kinetic Models of Five Species of Lactobacilli and Lactose Consumption in Batch Submerged Culture. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017, 48, 2, 251–258. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.12.007
Roos S, Jonsson H (2002) A high-molecular-mass cell-surface protein from Lactobacillus reuteri 1063 adheres to mucus components. Microbiol 148(Pt2):433–442. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/00221287-148-2-433
Ross R, Desmond C, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C (2005) Overcoming the technological hurdles in the development of probiotic foods. J Appl Microbiol. 2005; 98: 1410–1407. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-2672
Rossetti L, Giraffa G (2005) Rapid Identification of dairy lactic acid Bacteria by M13-Generated, RAPD-PCR fingerprint databases. J Microbiol Meth 63:135–144. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.001
Serrano-Niño JC, Solís-Pacheco JR, Gutierrez-Padilla JA, Cobián-García A, Cavazos-Garduño A, González-Reynoso O, Aguilar-Uscanga BR (2016) Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Human Milk with Potential Probiotic Role. J Food and Nutr Res. 2016; 4(3):170–177. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12691/jfnr-4-3-7
Servin AL (2004) Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28(4), 405–440. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/0.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003
Shazadi K, Arshad N (2022) Evaluation of inhibitory and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from vaginal microflora. Folia Microbiol 67(3):427–445
Shokryazdan P, Sieo CC, Kalavathy R, Liang JB, Alitheen NB, Jahromi MF, Ho YW (2014) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with antimicrobial activity against some human pathogenic strains. Biomed Res Int 2014, 1–16
Śliżewska K, Chlebicz-Wójcik A (2020) Growth Kinetics of Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains in the Alternative, Cost-Efficient Semi-Solid Fermentation Medium. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(12):423. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology9120423
Srinivash M, Krishnamoorthi R, Mahalingam PU, Malaikozhundan B, Keerthivasan M (2023) Probiotic potential of exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from homemade fermented food products. J Agric Food Res 11100517. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100517
Susković J, Kos B, Beganović J, Pavunc A, Habjanič K, Matosˇić S (2001) Role of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in synbiotic effect. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2001; 48: 296–307
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol biol evol 38(7):3022–3027
Tanaka H, Doesburg K, Iwasaki T, Mierau I (1999) Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity, J Dairy Sci, 82 (12), 2530–2535, December 1999
Tenea GN, Barrigas A (2018) The efficacy of bacteriocin-containing cell-free supernatant from Lactobacillus plantarum Cys5-4 to control pathogenic bacteria growth in artisanal beverages. Int Food Res J 25(5):2031–2037
Torshizi MAK, Rahimi S, Mojgani N, Esmaeilkhanian S, Grimes JL (2008) Screening of indigenous strains of lactic acid bacteria for development of a probiotic for poultry. Asian-australas. J Anim Sci 21(10):1495–1500. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5713/ajas.2008.80081
Toupal S, Coşansu S (2023) Effects of Freeze-Dried Banana and Watermelon Peel Powders on Bile Salt Resistance, Growth Kinetics, and Survival of Probiotic Bacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob 2023 Aug 3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-023-10131-0
Tsega KT, Maina KJ, Tesema NB (2023) Characterization of potential probiotics Lactobacillus species isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of Rhode Island Red (RIR) chicken in Ethiopia. Heliyon. 9 (2023), e17453 https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17453
Ucok G, Sert D (2020) Growth kinetics and biomass characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum L14 isolated from sourdough: effect of fermentation time on dough machinability LWT–Food Sci. Technol., 129 (2020), Article 109516, https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109516
Verdenelli MC, Ghelfi F, Silvi S, Orpianesi C, Cecchini C, Cresci A (2009) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from human faeces. Eur J Nutr. 2009;48(6):355 – 63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00394-009-0021-2
Verhasselt V, Milcent V, Cazareth J, Kanda A, Fleury S, Dombrowicz D, Glaichenhaus N, Julia V (2008) Breast milk-mediated transfer of an antigen induces tolerance and protection from allergic asthma. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):170–5
Wang J, Guo Z, Zhang Q, Yan L, Chen W, Liu XM, Zhang HP (2009) Fermentation Characteristics and Transit Tolerance of Probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang in Soymilk and Bovine Milk during Storage. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2468–2476. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3168/jds.2008-1849
Zhang D, Zhang S, Guidesi E, Zonenschain D, Sagheddu V, Lee S, Lim CY, Elli M (2018) Isolation and Characterization of New Probiotic Strains From Chinese Babies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018:S27-S34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001113
Zhao Q, Liu ZD, Xue Y, Wang JF, Li H, Tang QJ, Wang YM, Xue CH (2011) Ds-echinoside A, a new triterpene glycoside derived from sea cucumber, exhibits antimetastatic activity via the inhibition of NF-κB-dependent MMP-9 and VEGF expressions. J Zhejiang Uni Sci B 12(7):534–544
Zheng X, Duan Y, Dong H, Zhang J (2018) Efects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, digestive enzymes and gut morphology of Litopenaeus vannamei. Probiotics Antimicro 10:504–510. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12602-017-9300-z
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank who contributed to the realization of present research.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.E.K. conceived the study; A.E.K. designed the experiments. A.E.K., İ.Z., E.M.S., G.Ö. performed the experiments and analysed the data. F.İ.Ş. contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The studies involving humans were approved by the Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01/110). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informe consent to participate in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kavak, A.E., Zent, İ., Sağır, E.M. et al. Characterization of nuvita biosearch center (NBC) isolated lactic acid bacteria strains from human origin and determination of growth kinetic profiles of selected cultures under bioreactor. Ann Microbiol 74, 26 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-024-01772-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-024-01772-9